Open Access — CC BY 4.0Peer-Reviewed Working PaperCISR-WP-2025-04

Governance Mechanisms for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Regulated Financial Entities

schoolProf. Eleanor Vance(Director & Chair in Sustainable Enterprise)
schoolDr. Marcus Thorne(Senior Research Fellow in SME Industrial Systems)
calendar_todayPublished March 2026
menu_bookWorking Paper No. CISR-WP-2025-04
Executive AbstractScholarly Overview

Examines algorithmic governance, auditability, and regulatory compliance under the EU AI Act within commercial banks and asset management organizations. We evaluate risk management structures and identify key vulnerabilities in third-party model dependency.

Controlled Vocabulary / Indexing Keywords
Digital TransformationAI GovernanceFinancial RegulationAlgorithmic Risk

Standard Academic Citation

Cite this scholarly manuscript using official bibliographic conventions

Prof. Eleanor Vance, Dr. Marcus Thorne (2025). Governance Mechanisms for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Regulated Financial Entities. Journal of Banking & Management Technology, CISR-WP-2025-04, pp. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.09.004
auto_storiesOnline Scholarly Document ReaderOpen Access
Page 1 of 38
CISR Working Paper Series — WP-2026-04ISSN 2753-9128

Governance Mechanisms for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Regulated Financial Entities

Peer-Reviewed Working Paper • Section 1

1. Institutional Background and SME Asymmetries
Small and medium-sized enterprises constitute over 98% of business enterprises within Northern European industrial supply chains and account for more than 60% of manufacturing value added. However, academic frameworks regarding circular business models (CBMs) have predominantly derived empirical grounding from diversified multinational enterprises.

Unlike global conglomerates equipped with dedicated sustainability accounting divisions, SMEs face structural barriers including high initial capital expenditure requirements, scarce access to reverse supply chain infrastructure, and uncertain residual asset valuation under conventional bank lending covenants.

2. Empirical Field Audit Methodology
To overcome self-reporting biases prevalent in cross-sectional survey research, this inquiry executed 18 longitudinal on-site facility audits across automated manufacturing plants in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Primary observations focused on material sorting throughput, closed-loop polymer recycling yields, and energy consumption metrics during reverse assembly runs.

Centre for Innovation and Sustainability Research (CISR)Page 1 of 38

Scholarly References

4 Indexed Citations
[1]
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy”. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 308–320.
[2]
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?”. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 757–768.
[3]
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations”. Ecological Economics, vol. 143, no. C, pp. 37–46.
[4]
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities”. Long Range Planning, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 40–49.